{"id":"W2088102267","doi":"10.1002/jae.1070","title":"Forecasting realized volatility: a Bayesian model‐averaging approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Realized variance; Volatility (finance); Autoregressive model; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Forward volatility; Bayesian probability; Stochastic volatility; Economics; Implied volatility; SABR volatility model; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002531918,0.0002817103,0.001047179,0.001697277,0.0001874601,0.0001645218,0.0004730456,0.0002060416,0.00005027372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003634022,0.0003207371,0.0003575845,0.001279916,0.00003753498,0.0005480349,0.00005126711,0.0005618253,0.00001503716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001047698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001583153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001097951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967892,0.000009320027,0.002116344,0.0004618368,0.0001092875,0.0005139749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974594,0.0001023654,0.00170141,0.0003837507,0.0001169029,0.0002361574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006916131,0.001014087,0.02006275,0.0001732645,0.0002413661,0.00001980609,0.003982567,0.3004982,0.00004773632,0.5697896,0.001317644,0.1021614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008613432,0.00009289219,0.0008673428,0.00001201313,0.00001465084,0.00001533506,0.00008596043,0.7849987,0.00001996121,0.2112082,0.001557839,0.0002656921],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1981645,0.001212927,0.6827936,0.0001785547,0.0002292052,0.0002343302,0.00003442445,0.00003248376,0.1171199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286641,0.000200431,0.07044665,0.0003180064,0.0002635832,0.000003561394,0.000006997253,0.00003037521,0.00006632439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7304996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08285830512226249,"score_gpt":0.2288791655409856,"score_spread":0.1460208604187231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}