{"id":"W2088111058","doi":"10.1109/tcomm.2012.100512.120006","title":"Multi-Edge-Type Low-Density Parity-Check Codes for Bandwidth-Efficient Modulation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Low-density parity-check code; Computer science; Algorithm; Bit error rate; Modulation (music); Error detection and correction; Electronic engineering; Turbo code; Block code; Linear code; Bandwidth (computing); Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Decoding methods; Telecommunications; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004273411,0.0003525784,0.0003249042,0.0005195259,0.0003319716,0.0004490881,0.0005632065,0.0004943398,0.0009691936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001357516,0.0001810875,0.0002279409,0.0004280003,0.0004306172,0.0004730758,0.000544407,0.0008159097,0.0004051725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002679747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004366716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001716928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003688856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997154,0.00009255787,0.00001301531,0.00003057252,0.0001261874,0.00002229403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995469,0.000168638,0.00005284297,0.0001135939,0.00009908049,0.00001881495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001871387,0.0001005168,0.001392024,0.0002844027,0.00003778642,0.000211407,0.0002120071,0.2559261,0.175546,0.2940771,0.001793907,0.2702317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001775524,0.0001042676,0.0003286508,0.00003708841,0.00001244348,0.0002578232,0.00001076095,0.899216,0.06054706,0.03363671,0.00580245,0.00002891529],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01499847,0.0002463358,0.9825289,0.00005897137,0.00002138294,0.00002167372,0.00002470707,0.00016686,0.001932717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3239638,0.0004626756,0.6729905,0.00008805805,0.00003621969,0.0001200409,0.00009544064,0.00006311436,0.002180065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009691936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003242314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07044379227568483,"score_gpt":0.3303119265769172,"score_spread":0.2598681343012323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}