{"id":"W2088166615","doi":"10.1007/s11269-008-9294-0","title":"An Inexact Chance-constrained Quadratic Programming Model for Stream Water Quality Management","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Resources Management","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Water quality; Quadratic programming; Computer science; Transformation (genetics); Nonlinear programming; Interval (graph theory); Quadratic equation; Hydrogeology; Quality (philosophy); Nonlinear system; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004875314,0.0005264333,0.0004097375,0.0004147877,0.0003896112,0.0002407333,0.0005951573,0.00009754299,0.00006781836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001219742,0.0003802907,0.0001779157,0.000151765,0.00009631837,0.0004468251,0.0002131355,0.0001276451,0.00008111721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001185796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001235347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001560311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001463965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970202,0.00006025087,0.0006994852,0.0006626268,0.0004862236,0.001071181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.000007676172,0.00005872631,0.000764838,0.00004380007,0.0001758966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001200522,0.0002600839,0.0002625771,0.0016013,0.0005588513,0.00006189119,0.01182417,0.9684005,0.0003740378,0.0006903334,0.0005159865,0.01533022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001969167,0.0001399779,0.000273226,0.00006830212,0.0001947266,0.00000377138,0.0008390271,0.9378845,0.003586721,0.0004599685,0.05367218,0.0009084503],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5644795,0.0000509192,0.418584,0.0001369217,0.000211671,0.003033423,0.00001434609,0.001415906,0.01207332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660478,0.00008246301,0.02470557,0.0001262368,0.0001470685,0.0008944875,0.0004966806,0.000136109,0.007363591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4015683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02423675182781286,"score_gpt":0.2364067934202786,"score_spread":0.2121700415924658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}