{"id":"W2088274037","doi":"10.2147/ppa.s30613","title":"Nonadherence in type 2 diabetes: practical considerations for interpreting the literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Patient Preference and Adherence","topic":"Medication Adherence and Compliance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Narrative review; Type 2 diabetes; Medical prescription; Health care; Medication adherence; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Diabetes mellitus; Intensive care medicine; Compliance (psychology); Nursing; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001522674,0.0001608329,0.0002136817,0.00005323231,0.0001257985,0.0001267107,0.00007402658,0.00008900076,0.001106674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001462156,0.000104998,0.00003437656,0.0002507249,0.0001391965,0.0003032483,0.00005708659,0.0003327017,0.0003487929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000206223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001829935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002837237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009898811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987563,0.00006820746,0.000348683,0.0003459523,0.0001891827,0.0002916978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983721,0.0007106896,0.0001258704,0.0002979179,0.0003566987,0.0001367222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000640689,0.001861223,0.477085,0.00194047,0.0002442097,0.00006208965,0.02396235,0.0000217093,0.03372037,0.03365221,0.1834966,0.2433131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01128924,0.0167624,0.5830374,0.0258499,0.0004334861,0.0006207883,0.01704422,0.06231875,0.02140167,0.2193927,0.03821825,0.00363112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875841,0.0009332745,0.0002990477,0.005387656,0.0001861316,0.001939818,0.000008782817,0.00004035725,0.003620883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913523,0.0002057139,0.003750788,0.00305997,0.0000364407,0.0008778181,0.00001767527,0.000008882513,0.0006903869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.239682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09062871040329853,"score_gpt":0.3282567745993387,"score_spread":0.2376280641960401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}