{"id":"W2088457606","doi":"10.2166/wst.2013.148","title":"UV disinfection of wastewater flocs: the effect of secondary treatment conditions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"National Water Research Institute","keywords":"Effluent; Wastewater; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Activated sludge; Sewage treatment; Fecal coliform; Kinetics; Environmental engineering; Environmental chemistry; Microbiology; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology; Water quality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003991315,0.0005779788,0.000533833,0.0002983436,0.0002827065,0.000544392,0.000210458,0.0004816587,0.001060621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006788934,0.0001597742,0.0003910275,0.0001520668,0.0001994813,0.0002979423,0.0001875918,0.0004712606,0.0001820148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003227028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003583787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002022021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002097587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997143,0.00006835184,0.00003083508,0.00005491607,0.00007826114,0.00005319497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994531,0.0001854539,0.0001223329,0.00003399903,0.000122276,0.00008277099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000197821,0.0000757501,0.0004442686,0.0001142176,0.000009788232,0.00003554588,0.00002787026,0.0001286005,0.9974616,0.00001188889,0.00001724977,0.001475398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007842054,0.0007003192,0.005658413,0.000009511617,0.0000176216,0.00006950091,0.00001994049,0.0002544648,0.9929529,0.000005516996,0.0002990861,0.000004967079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976068,0.0008900784,0.0006257761,0.00002805243,0.00002132188,0.00004164036,0.00009992023,0.00001566821,0.0006708973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971154,0.0006090043,0.001326728,0.00002778361,0.00001259766,0.00002484488,0.0001344737,0.00001520803,0.000734044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002022021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004020512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003206600973995327,"score_gpt":0.2025551509599262,"score_spread":0.1993485499859309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}