{"id":"W2088486464","doi":"10.1016/s0166-3615(01)00100-2","title":"A fuzzy mathematics based optimal delivery scheduling approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers in Industry","topic":"Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Tokyo; Tianjin University","keywords":"Smalltalk; Scheduling (production processes); Computer science; Cluster analysis; Fuzzy logic; Job shop scheduling; Mathematical optimization; Object-oriented programming; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Operating system; Schedule","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006065608,0.0005876659,0.001049695,0.001281471,0.0007205018,0.001193549,0.001354325,0.0009045368,0.003856294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001184938,0.0004223539,0.0009962693,0.001056834,0.000516072,0.001117462,0.0006350538,0.0008143974,0.0005033883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001614379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001381029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006891856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004843147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996063,0.00008318516,0.00001897472,0.00005492831,0.0002002745,0.0000363444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996889,0.0001577801,0.0000289985,0.00001871027,0.00008903193,0.00001665426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005167827,0.00007795875,0.0001536895,0.00008050894,0.00004319241,0.00006132711,0.00004748393,0.8535566,0.00312869,0.07933421,0.00126964,0.06219502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006820582,0.00001956777,0.00004228311,0.000004155437,0.000008427758,0.00001224409,0.000006575655,0.9868571,0.0003525999,0.01161585,0.001069197,0.000005082741],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005317903,0.0002593367,0.9885024,0.000193407,0.00009389104,0.00003887456,0.00002662863,0.00007163271,0.005495988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4530859,0.0009872764,0.5324655,0.0001525205,0.0002194886,0.0001946389,0.00009911201,0.00007076404,0.01272475],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006891856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01370347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02158375245560249,"score_gpt":0.2234755808793321,"score_spread":0.2018918284237296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}