{"id":"W2088514628","doi":"10.1177/1063293x11420176","title":"Developing a Dynamic Wheelchair Using the Design Structure Matrix Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrent Engineering","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Process (computing); Manual wheelchair; Engineering; Computer science; Design process; Human–computer interaction; Simulation; Operations management; Work in process","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001044927,0.0009633977,0.0004873842,0.0009185882,0.0005210183,0.0007760116,0.0006601898,0.0004809891,0.003394371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001656638,0.0005210146,0.0007347703,0.0005865573,0.0003921397,0.0004779824,0.0007469371,0.0006395659,0.0007816193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005196928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003415367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006191283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992689,0.0002275415,0.0000428357,0.00009085664,0.0003305586,0.00003925587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993665,0.0002783984,0.0000629596,0.00004534642,0.0002223902,0.00002452422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009016498,0.0001292083,0.00151302,0.0007736518,0.00008951741,0.000274263,0.0007929711,0.4956689,0.05005643,0.03198517,0.002355119,0.4162716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007485676,0.0003452457,0.0003702917,0.0000699905,0.00004963197,0.000191705,0.0001758509,0.9468606,0.0129178,0.01102068,0.02789026,0.00003305874],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00263328,0.00003156918,0.9957079,0.00002167395,0.00000952968,0.00007919736,0.00001456053,0.0002110333,0.00129116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04458605,0.00009533207,0.9538793,0.00001252358,0.000005090692,0.0002513364,0.00005992403,0.00004819736,0.001062274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003415367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01135528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07920599905516156,"score_gpt":0.3287662006105174,"score_spread":0.2495602015553559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}