{"id":"W2088774813","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2008.08.022","title":"Does the stationary viscous flow around a circular cylinder exist for large Reynolds numbers? A numerical solution via variational imbedding","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Reynolds number; Mathematical analysis; Cylinder; Flow (mathematics); Boundary value problem; Euler equations; Navier–Stokes equations; Partial differential equation; Compressibility; Geometry; Mechanics; Turbulence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007561572,0.000641727,0.0007683084,0.0007442204,0.000588369,0.001186176,0.0009554815,0.001942437,0.002046176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004241279,0.0005123944,0.0008306836,0.0002759981,0.00210119,0.002570896,0.001596117,0.001008581,0.000332669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000365346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004014711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008128529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004046724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.000048498,0.00001078901,0.00003531445,0.00001959958,0.0000206433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995456,0.0001884913,0.00008242409,0.00004143362,0.00007723844,0.00006469992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001852792,0.00007964188,0.002027538,0.0003004194,0.00006187805,0.0006864276,0.0004969924,0.1111702,0.02025482,0.8460971,0.001621019,0.01701864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002835123,0.00006137464,0.000601914,0.00004195121,0.00001722568,0.0001355601,0.0001588319,0.8214763,0.002255338,0.1737029,0.001495085,0.00002517648],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.470525,0.001963462,0.5041986,0.002828624,0.0005388184,0.00007584849,0.00009153988,0.000163008,0.01961516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581493,0.0007251755,0.03335833,0.0001867112,0.0002184839,0.00003601073,0.00006278435,0.00008835793,0.007174868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002046176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006845117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02230242917117829,"score_gpt":0.2828603025066098,"score_spread":0.2605578733354315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}