{"id":"W2089125195","doi":"10.1139/e09-018","title":"Modeling topographical density for geoid determinationThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme<i>GEODESY</i>.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Geoid; Geodesy; Geology; Terrain; Gravitational field; Undulation of the geoid; Gravity of Earth; Series (stratigraphy); Geophysics; Computation; Physics; Classical mechanics; Geography; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003621891,0.0005039368,0.0003743031,0.0004150334,0.000407636,0.0006705796,0.0008517608,0.0007680104,0.001823086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002155055,0.0003709545,0.00041238,0.0005552227,0.000413645,0.000792177,0.000643096,0.0005551922,0.0003296847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009453128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001085173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01843985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01734845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998823,0.00003245519,0.000006381873,0.00001727459,0.00004851983,0.00001301323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.000282945,0.00004729391,0.00005283666,0.00008899294,0.0000251327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001123657,0.00002296826,0.002960395,0.0000528048,0.00001696395,0.00004227717,0.00008745718,0.967474,0.002615686,0.01307793,0.0009828846,0.01265544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001946688,0.000003345887,0.0002471756,0.000003742705,0.000002057859,0.000009000161,0.000005742222,0.9972638,0.0004679044,0.001116348,0.0008753331,0.000003658775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1805711,0.0007589395,0.8032274,0.0007549911,0.0002447947,0.00009849458,0.0005796858,0.001447551,0.01231708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7988101,0.0008336923,0.1962878,0.0001066258,0.00009687379,0.00008961105,0.0004107708,0.0003988027,0.002965603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01843985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03666508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03064039287640072,"score_gpt":0.21399202697909,"score_spread":0.1833516341026893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}