{"id":"W2089125195","doi":"10.1139/e09-018","title":"Modeling topographical density for geoid determinationThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme<i>GEODESY</i>.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Geoid; Geodesy; Geology; Terrain; Gravitational field; Undulation of the geoid; Gravity of Earth; Series (stratigraphy); Geophysics; Computation; Physics; Classical mechanics; Geography; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001296812,0.00007346371,0.0001836281,0.0002233352,0.0002048183,0.00008377507,0.0003169162,0.00003556946,0.002003327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002606861,0.00004955241,0.00009139227,0.0004737466,0.00025089,0.0003494813,0.000002104174,0.0001149553,0.000001861584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001830203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003929157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008214694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1904483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988468,0.00004895843,0.0003271702,0.0001157748,0.0004114792,0.0002497857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992818,0.00008096034,0.0001617092,0.00009366087,0.0002103111,0.000171524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002888154,0.0001491893,0.8754905,0.00003930834,0.00006259933,0.00002359897,0.0077213,0.02277521,0.0022744,0.003878419,0.001082017,0.0862146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005664713,0.001894971,0.9331142,0.0001776099,0.00002987,0.00001307263,0.001321148,0.01827761,0.009174233,0.03292501,0.002286524,0.0002192972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915771,0.00006630296,0.000009632302,0.004015646,0.0002087583,0.0001104486,0.00002449907,7.925064e-7,0.003986813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998871,0.00001210786,0.0004228261,0.000442873,0.0002150667,1.595137e-7,8.266195e-7,8.580985e-7,0.00003430537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1822336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03064039287640072,"score_gpt":0.21399202697909,"score_spread":0.1833516341026893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}