{"id":"W2089206726","doi":"10.4018/ijrcm.2012100104","title":"Consistent Application of Risk Management for Selection of Engineering Design Options in Mega-Projects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management","topic":"activated carbon and charcoal","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Risk analysis (engineering); Project risk management; Project management; Key (lock); Computer science; Risk management; Mega-; Project management triangle; Project planning; Systems engineering; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002561699,0.00008683526,0.0001973182,0.0006398584,0.00002871305,0.00002755807,0.0002884861,0.00003097323,0.00001433664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002776498,0.00007192129,0.0001078417,0.0002392919,0.00002258525,0.0002103716,0.00006859259,0.00009236759,8.138517e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005694685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009553824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000291468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007433783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982201,0.00008445329,0.0007806716,0.0001276191,0.0006610596,0.0001260491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998173,0.0003225724,0.0009301382,0.00009535699,0.0004342445,0.00004466742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006732434,0.0006534022,0.1656579,0.00006187917,0.0009366434,0.000004878067,0.002631134,0.01661632,0.001631142,0.06058933,0.0004551002,0.750089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007658227,0.0004814718,0.8074499,0.0004409308,0.0008493064,0.00004876154,0.01585224,0.1004052,0.01415129,0.03274702,0.01933648,0.0005791439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3619898,0.0005002132,0.6359358,0.00006553347,0.0004928797,0.0003300214,0.00001160003,0.00000506026,0.0006691335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764937,0.001046651,0.02230771,0.000007789748,0.00008190497,0.00001976139,0.000001154252,0.000005757212,0.00003553714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7495099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2932865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04294696434953481,"score_gpt":0.3257083001315239,"score_spread":0.2827613357819891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}