{"id":"W2089265865","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2014-0375","title":"Evaluation of fault-slip potential due to shearing of fault asperities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Rock Mechanics and Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Slip (aerodynamics); Seismic moment; Geology; Shearing (physics); Fault (geology); Shear (geology); Seismology; Shear stress; Asperity (geotechnical engineering); Geotechnical engineering; Mining engineering; Engineering; Petrology; Mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002391903,0.0002960068,0.000286847,0.0005725226,0.0001457833,0.0003416426,0.0002326125,0.0003473981,0.0008638992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008331311,0.000160752,0.0002448969,0.0004288549,0.000287566,0.000263975,0.0002523493,0.0001370302,0.00009038772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003042783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002239461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003353624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999144,0.00001309772,0.000007837881,0.00001212809,0.00003216483,0.00002029882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996806,0.0001463897,0.00007459216,0.0000265619,0.00004423605,0.00002760605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007097741,0.0001514001,0.2412035,0.0001915812,0.0001017858,0.0009879965,0.0001715193,0.5991037,0.1311516,0.0007182154,0.00010588,0.02540312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002142979,0.0005611954,0.1691937,0.00001382341,0.000057567,0.0003181801,0.0002246207,0.8028768,0.02613489,0.0003077658,0.0002674354,0.00002267983],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979981,0.00003462309,0.001448099,0.000004608823,0.00000111065,0.00000421391,0.00005954449,0.00001964429,0.0004301847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996623,0.00001868666,0.0002240071,5.043505e-7,4.164251e-7,0.000001118536,0.00002658197,0.000001304804,0.00006520608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003104506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006172895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03818390657536586,"score_gpt":0.2525720831760799,"score_spread":0.2143881766007141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}