{"id":"W2089274521","doi":"10.15288/jsad.2011.72.577","title":"Economic Analysis of Methamphetamine Prevention Effects and Employer Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Cost–benefit analysis; Intervention (counseling); Methamphetamine; Medicine; Cost effectiveness; Poison control; Environmental health; Psychology; Psychiatry; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002523,0.0001032812,0.0006444001,0.0002879826,0.00003014425,0.000002920997,0.00002284236,0.00002783845,0.00001507207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004335618,0.00006413107,0.0001708446,0.0001083578,0.00007034165,0.00007350175,0.00001575401,0.00005721484,0.000001407786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005006739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001286067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006705975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003004176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993706,0.00002940126,0.0003234043,0.00009137848,0.0001059589,0.0000793041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.000185774,0.0002960308,0.00007759684,0.00007577977,0.00006185789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008880959,0.0002474224,0.9547873,0.00009647711,0.0163964,0.00005102449,0.01057773,0.000003423703,0.0003780097,0.0001872601,0.0001742149,0.0162126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004732689,0.001382379,0.9745314,0.0003107472,0.008111891,0.0000210495,0.003913742,0.00001658152,0.006672536,0.0001936808,0.00002746213,0.00008582441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914975,0.007713523,0.000004155701,0.00009080121,0.0001176906,0.00009705521,5.812903e-7,0.000003718836,0.0004749839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946855,0.004556515,0.0003774962,0.00008648763,0.00003799811,0.000002137034,6.636434e-7,0.000005511874,0.0002477467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01974408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2615189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05470227245699795,"score_gpt":0.3428995144850411,"score_spread":0.2881972420280432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}