{"id":"W2089274521","doi":"10.15288/jsad.2011.72.577","title":"Economic Analysis of Methamphetamine Prevention Effects and Employer Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Cost–benefit analysis; Intervention (counseling); Methamphetamine; Medicine; Cost effectiveness; Poison control; Environmental health; Psychology; Psychiatry; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01123101,0.0009216658,0.001652839,0.002010763,0.0002505964,0.00165203,0.0007956552,0.0011282,0.006886239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04229611,0.0005460711,0.003197938,0.001884952,0.0005911987,0.001307134,0.0007203179,0.00167753,0.0001717993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004506771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00268596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004812276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003262522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865151,0.01142665,0.0003700336,0.0002576554,0.00104484,0.0003857525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696857,0.02733279,0.001671865,0.0003550058,0.0006562159,0.0002985008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07280116,0.003866265,0.06498083,0.02378694,0.03396737,0.0007379754,0.0002884452,0.3677326,0.001073619,0.05745542,0.008500536,0.364809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03558448,0.02901636,0.1633222,0.01717539,0.06939653,0.001973234,0.00149357,0.5525166,0.005252546,0.08298256,0.04078083,0.0005058076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7484206,0.1413635,0.02902095,0.008320833,0.0007768241,0.007376111,0.009149975,0.0001432813,0.05542791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815646,0.01056875,0.004095584,0.0004305173,0.00009024994,0.001140785,0.0007175898,0.00001504104,0.001376967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05470227245699795,"score_gpt":0.3428995144850411,"score_spread":0.2881972420280432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}