{"id":"W2089369428","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.047","title":"Estimation of chlorination by-products presence in drinking water in epidemiological studies on adverse reproductive outcomes: A review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Water Treatment and Disinfection","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Epidemiology; Tap water; Environmental health; Chlorine; Adverse effect; Waterborne diseases; Medicine; Exposure assessment; Water disinfection; Toxicology; Human health; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Biology; Outbreak; Chemistry; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409954,0.0002860139,0.000859814,0.00007767654,0.0001063676,0.000004789467,0.0006081728,0.00005785922,0.00003736345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000822963,0.0001167,0.000197481,0.0005227313,0.001153847,0.000252433,0.0005381482,0.0002121279,0.00006253436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008500059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001517536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006894212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001542897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971958,0.0003908299,0.0007857645,0.0006735906,0.0006676927,0.0002862534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984627,0.0001513943,0.0005313717,0.0008245141,0.000004961992,0.00002500651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004895965,0.001911414,0.001005258,0.005001829,0.0001144491,0.000004989243,0.003517676,0.3675064,0.000996843,0.0002158609,0.000284415,0.6193919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006574646,0.00799916,0.427601,0.3440094,0.007875792,0.0002365349,0.002111984,0.008140988,0.1073241,0.04161648,0.03687195,0.009637987],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2611349,0.7317225,0.000003605487,0.001966883,0.0003853882,0.004286167,0.000006284537,0.0000149366,0.0004793659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1325536,0.8668831,0.00007562981,0.00001897132,0.0000108281,0.0001168419,0.00000573395,0.000007706769,0.0003275649],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6097538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4758889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05906795087908395,"score_gpt":0.3258237843457115,"score_spread":0.2667558334666275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}