{"id":"W2089395606","doi":"10.1118/1.2977759","title":"An empirical method for lag correction in cone‐beam CT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Artifact (error); Image quality; Visibility; Cone beam computed tomography; Optics; Computer science; Contrast (vision); Projection (relational algebra); Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Image (mathematics); Computed tomography; Algorithm; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004378831,0.000111181,0.0002982462,0.00003753096,0.00007442512,0.000004513161,0.0001214711,0.00008755601,0.0001265273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005036428,0.0000914933,0.00008463554,0.0002607846,0.0001705237,0.00005033261,0.00002273845,0.0004072676,0.00001801823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005472133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002112091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007476249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004740452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99874,0.00003974475,0.0002679354,0.0002768125,0.0004413592,0.0002341449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989471,0.0002648921,0.0000440669,0.0002866602,0.00006705504,0.0003901899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001848547,0.004153213,0.03693906,0.0001491103,0.00004583645,0.0002294725,0.0006415668,0.00001021081,0.004802054,0.001278362,0.5797739,0.3717924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008541656,0.001808029,0.02497781,0.000577672,0.0002119409,0.001458889,0.0001340883,0.4485817,0.1080046,0.01993004,0.3848845,0.0008890348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08854049,0.00001982012,0.9000165,0.009421553,0.0001990454,0.0005482569,0.000005029472,0.0002401316,0.001009129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370463,0.00006445232,0.05265692,0.008271946,0.001011395,0.000310418,0.000142103,0.00003511877,0.0004613634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3730989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06498545558830444,"score_gpt":0.4320909301886533,"score_spread":0.3671054746003489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}