{"id":"W2089395606","doi":"10.1118/1.2977759","title":"An empirical method for lag correction in cone‐beam CT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Artifact (error); Image quality; Visibility; Cone beam computed tomography; Optics; Computer science; Contrast (vision); Projection (relational algebra); Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Image (mathematics); Computed tomography; Algorithm; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003174507,0.001063642,0.0005245676,0.001401105,0.0005657883,0.001055669,0.001556243,0.0009329839,0.002234061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01613729,0.0005394997,0.0007133438,0.001260555,0.0006388273,0.001175133,0.001013246,0.001366855,0.001091381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007893577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001839009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002434812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003653738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980894,0.0005566757,0.0001864317,0.0003398414,0.0007396165,0.00008800641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931445,0.003340599,0.0007255315,0.001015112,0.001686898,0.00008738294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003581315,0.0001679889,0.005543133,0.0005850395,0.0001340168,0.0003512586,0.0004486537,0.06959492,0.08349635,0.01710188,0.003987783,0.8182308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004340156,0.0002303111,0.005207104,0.00009716636,0.00008059047,0.001062616,0.00006087466,0.9224231,0.04388302,0.005497509,0.02129213,0.0001221246],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005561207,0.0001705941,0.9930485,0.00003905074,0.00004891604,0.00006828279,0.00002612782,0.000742554,0.0002947369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0567125,0.0002675289,0.9410219,0.00004772096,0.00004275444,0.0001684242,0.0001146171,0.0004636682,0.001160885],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003174507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01678866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06498545558830444,"score_gpt":0.4320909301886533,"score_spread":0.3671054746003489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}