{"id":"W2089437330","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jms048","title":"Dealing with Compliance and Non-Compliance: The Case of the Landmine Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Obligation; Convention; Persuasion; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006767235,0.00005441797,0.00009664524,0.00001592319,0.0002476132,0.00003537048,0.0002338776,0.0000180697,0.00005162841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001087209,0.0000240073,0.00005438757,0.00006705839,0.000305464,0.0003140079,0.00003189271,0.0001137568,0.000001412544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002607134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002649312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008350866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001580586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993884,0.00004444241,0.0001902419,0.0000398975,0.0002494547,0.00008756497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.0001625612,0.0002910537,0.00006272507,0.0002891373,0.00005134376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002841519,0.0001523062,0.3044844,0.00006886292,0.0001553228,0.0001043409,0.00953306,0.0001149716,0.00115843,0.6810409,0.000381762,0.002521449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003938654,0.0004722207,0.7805563,0.004323238,0.0004036292,0.01742942,0.01668892,0.001721069,0.002289853,0.03732935,0.134133,0.0007143171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761137,0.000525466,0.000330742,0.005805161,0.0006220429,0.00006322524,0.000004116214,0.000001967576,0.01653356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988919,0.00006040495,0.0002084774,0.000161516,0.0004409153,6.917612e-7,2.443464e-7,0.000003057432,0.0002327273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1904466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05044417631193153,"score_gpt":0.3689975353635101,"score_spread":0.3185533590515786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}