{"id":"W2089663147","doi":"10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.046-053.oar","title":"Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","topic":"Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gonial angle; Sagittal plane; Cephalometric analysis; Cephalometry; Medicine; Orthodontics; Analysis of variance; Cone beam computed tomography; Mandible (arthropod mouthpart); Malocclusion; Dentistry; Radiography; Computed tomography; Anatomy; Biology; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217345,0.0007865733,0.001775514,0.001449646,0.0002742981,0.0006398349,0.0009322767,0.0003436346,0.0002376233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000597912,0.0005945976,0.001638584,0.001309428,0.0002112367,0.0004630158,0.0002361716,0.001023985,0.00004204378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001677082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006618186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001433817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000840942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933586,0.0006785053,0.001732596,0.0006593188,0.00267439,0.0008966177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954685,0.0006910547,0.001759336,0.0008010874,0.0005368594,0.000743167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006962379,0.001010385,0.9828663,0.00007861816,0.002692498,0.001258822,0.00009823217,0.0006954703,0.0002161516,0.0006043797,0.0001410891,0.009641807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00382829,0.001491675,0.98001,0.0001559159,0.004898755,0.0007740291,0.00014311,0.001085738,0.001802326,0.00002078435,0.004917791,0.000871559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129887,0.000293181,0.08321873,0.00002859254,0.001745233,0.0003030726,0.0001678424,0.00006952461,0.001185154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969089,0.0002161761,0.001222431,0.0001272538,0.0009097282,0.000008306243,0.0000691445,0.0001144435,0.0004235991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08392025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0202988519446846,"score_gpt":0.2739065515695695,"score_spread":0.2536076996248849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}