{"id":"W2089663147","doi":"10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.046-053.oar","title":"Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","topic":"Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gonial angle; Sagittal plane; Cephalometric analysis; Cephalometry; Medicine; Orthodontics; Analysis of variance; Cone beam computed tomography; Mandible (arthropod mouthpart); Malocclusion; Dentistry; Radiography; Computed tomography; Anatomy; Biology; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007307662,0.0004131607,0.0003183362,0.002558601,0.0002647068,0.0005602807,0.0001770148,0.000243308,0.002978639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003692229,0.0001569677,0.0004694871,0.00145196,0.0003060697,0.0003944761,0.0003845475,0.0001739595,0.0005982704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002260424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002738219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003340793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990426,0.000139439,0.0002146221,0.0001381577,0.0003999829,0.00006518947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987149,0.0003565596,0.0004733352,0.00008630224,0.0003232511,0.00004560804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004530863,0.00004131642,0.9540949,0.0001444782,0.00009511512,0.0006036661,0.0004567436,0.0003180049,0.009268258,0.0000776424,0.0002802487,0.03416646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003928767,0.00006401804,0.9971657,0.000009817652,0.00002443025,0.001446964,0.000260418,0.0002082017,0.0004894165,0.00001618049,0.000306119,0.000004670954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994545,0.0004592557,0.001816114,0.0000243399,0.00001179754,0.00007774495,0.001106673,0.00002379804,0.00193525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962901,0.0002705481,0.001977043,0.000009144715,0.000008866709,0.00005635419,0.0009906814,0.00001156595,0.000385586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002978639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009964585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0202988519446846,"score_gpt":0.2739065515695695,"score_spread":0.2536076996248849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}