{"id":"W2089711502","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.126","title":"New Statistical Method to Analyze Three-Dimensional Landmark Configurations Obtained with Cone-Beam CT: Basic Features and Clinical Application for Rapid Maxillary Expansion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Radiology","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Medicine; Cone beam computed tomography; Orthodontics; Statistical analysis; Cone beam ct; Pattern recognition (psychology); Computed tomography; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827255,0.0001592061,0.0005514088,0.0001294528,0.0001124912,0.00001719983,0.0001193646,0.000114768,0.0001233855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008191073,0.0001016839,0.00009787604,0.00013447,0.00007828063,0.00009266182,0.00002653529,0.0002632372,0.000003046124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002728321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001182569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001096888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001188564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984588,0.0002747974,0.0006525692,0.0001961643,0.0001562789,0.0002614109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955421,0.003299366,0.000392056,0.0001784149,0.0001948884,0.0003931719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002872191,0.0008763076,0.05919144,0.00008150657,0.001094359,0.0001058935,0.000247894,0.0001587744,0.009373735,0.5227036,0.2426125,0.1606818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01407213,0.009279677,0.7655405,0.0001777419,0.002243192,0.03113306,0.0004318749,0.003176465,0.002571484,0.1418017,0.02831819,0.001253935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1059803,0.0002681727,0.8915681,0.001509072,0.0001329575,0.0003723155,0.00004510939,0.00001333258,0.0001106197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3773985,0.00001638761,0.6215986,0.0003837988,0.0004913272,0.00001098651,0.00003860582,0.00001569323,0.00004611797],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7063491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.414655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03527890122163738,"score_gpt":0.3465739196123477,"score_spread":0.3112950183907103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}