{"id":"W2089754016","doi":"10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608566","title":"Fuzzy dynamic programming for optimized scheduling of repetitive construction projects","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Dynamic programming; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Schedule; Fuzzy set; Duration (music); Computation; Set (abstract data type); Project management; Operations research; Industrial engineering; Algorithm; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002785549,0.0002361889,0.0005465632,0.0005511483,0.0001943328,0.0003737913,0.0005640786,0.0001631357,0.0004085303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007399148,0.000174317,0.0002845143,0.0009798585,0.0004058446,0.0006552609,0.0001252669,0.0001870886,0.00008414955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005705655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002317402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000879273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001164995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964082,0.0001783592,0.00122816,0.0007576813,0.0009407639,0.0004868129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950245,0.002129472,0.000711662,0.000591052,0.001409766,0.0001335561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003298746,0.0001808879,0.007250281,0.0001087994,0.0001687543,0.000003713154,0.003198203,0.00574258,0.02108713,0.02581492,0.0001952205,0.9359196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01120623,0.001525645,0.003107885,0.0005934521,0.0002108461,0.0003580985,0.1550755,0.585243,0.06278981,0.1748534,0.002828433,0.002207637],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6516803,0.00006184691,0.322132,0.0006699055,0.0003782025,0.003447752,0.00001224628,0.0001839827,0.02143375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4812275,0.000002700287,0.5180193,0.00003298997,0.00003417142,0.0002126925,0.000004623586,0.00001545327,0.0004506677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8858006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06595495741476406,"score_gpt":0.3622464280599901,"score_spread":0.2962914706452261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}