{"id":"W2089833074","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n1p3","title":"Progressing a Sustainable-world: A Case study of the South Australian Government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Ecological footprint; Transformational leadership; Mainstream; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Humanity; Sustainable development; Population; Political science; Environmental ethics; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Public relations; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151887,0.0003830799,0.0004585091,0.0002140326,0.0006416271,0.00007193253,0.0007895585,0.00007980032,0.0008834372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001021373,0.0002693755,0.0001532918,0.001243873,0.0002821848,0.0006909356,0.00126409,0.0003895298,0.00001456363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002936656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000326457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008960326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001042725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956681,0.0001775012,0.001263035,0.0003385347,0.00148817,0.00106464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979526,0.00003301863,0.001193578,0.0004337491,0.0001073918,0.0002796883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003678715,0.00314886,0.7430037,0.0002565635,0.0003425684,0.03904241,0.2047762,0.000498569,0.00009389794,0.0002954872,0.002589767,0.005584057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001749924,0.0004200775,0.2761711,0.00005047066,0.0001037116,0.001428043,0.6991771,0.000005953178,0.0028523,0.0002508635,0.01739728,0.0003931445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924436,0.00002908654,0.00002541576,0.00009788808,0.0001169227,0.001136703,5.079635e-7,0.00001332836,0.006136572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628285,0.000002067935,0.002002335,0.00007308753,0.0000374161,0.0000495637,2.517916e-7,0.00003796923,0.03496878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4944009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02159511823661101,"score_gpt":0.2350881728781033,"score_spread":0.2134930546414923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}