{"id":"W2089833074","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n1p3","title":"Progressing a Sustainable-world: A Case study of the South Australian Government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Ecological footprint; Transformational leadership; Mainstream; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Humanity; Sustainable development; Population; Political science; Environmental ethics; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Public relations; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003841412,0.0004960149,0.0006140747,0.001555776,0.02085,0.003856981,0.00208595,0.004003461,0.004028324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008393207,0.0005561109,0.0004539129,0.003892753,0.00714669,0.002816044,0.005614941,0.003719528,0.0004205726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01320863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007302439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2484149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.403022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950776,0.003116102,0.0001230827,0.000236849,0.0005759714,0.0008704854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959911,0.002173239,0.0003951716,0.0002469517,0.0003898451,0.0008038297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007965342,0.0005948448,0.01667308,0.000320531,0.0000275419,0.02368207,0.9169594,0.0008858335,0.0007843171,0.02170169,0.003452679,0.01483833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001340735,0.0001506823,0.0153792,0.0001820593,0.00001971604,0.001881646,0.9469072,0.0007960945,0.0003048798,0.001736584,0.0325995,0.00002915949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752384,0.0003662196,0.0004465803,0.004694115,0.00001937274,0.0001108091,0.00003739802,0.000009158436,0.01907786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892441,0.0009204913,0.0008690337,0.0007098916,0.00001234358,0.0000900375,0.00002772024,0.00001301477,0.008113354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2484149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4939378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02159511823661101,"score_gpt":0.2350881728781033,"score_spread":0.2134930546414923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}