{"id":"W2089834504","doi":"10.1007/s10734-008-9147-z","title":"Facilitating interdisciplinary work: using quality assessment to create common ground","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Common ground; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Perception; Work (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1015307,0.001042722,0.001303121,0.01202127,0.006236422,0.01760832,0.003926466,0.002751494,0.003443811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1745075,0.0009661438,0.001082959,0.005798377,0.005892043,0.01549165,0.01842303,0.003171431,0.0009178852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007008092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01914948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005890555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8731515,0.08482947,0.005920418,0.005075349,0.02804418,0.002979069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7783898,0.1163175,0.02572894,0.02793271,0.04180308,0.00982803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000334901,0.001097912,0.03703767,0.001410453,0.0002499977,0.0002235497,0.03917261,0.005355203,0.004691579,0.07917424,0.01067374,0.8205782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006877096,0.002158622,0.06394433,0.006288987,0.000638966,0.0007697569,0.07787919,0.08471922,0.02647117,0.5905555,0.1449829,0.0009037384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319235,0.001204836,0.7974057,0.01414586,0.0004594015,0.002126278,0.0001469628,0.001558936,0.05102863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.480554,0.0005017549,0.5152505,0.0005847705,0.00007422224,0.0007216022,0.0001379693,0.0001990923,0.001976148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1015307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5369521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3574209058193805,"score_gpt":0.5611031016555118,"score_spread":0.2036821958361313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}