{"id":"W2089946748","doi":"10.1002/ece3.329","title":"Effective/census population size ratio estimation: a compendium and appraisal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":390,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Statistics; Population; Estimation; Compendium; Confidence interval; Effective population size; Census; Population size; Demography; Mathematics; Geography; Econometrics; Biology; Sociology; Genetic variation; Economics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001194677,0.00007472488,0.00007572106,0.00002131939,0.0001729653,0.000008959958,0.00002246733,0.0001597932,0.00002033195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001096765,0.0000768832,0.00001588616,0.00003144946,0.00005667526,0.00001099795,0.00004444655,0.00004875674,0.00000549011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001053226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000529468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001941834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002852393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995407,0.00007564304,0.00007980593,0.0001342154,0.00003951946,0.0001301101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997708,0.00003716714,0.00004584368,0.00006698613,0.00002233411,0.00005690474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007385415,0.00002295121,0.9865507,0.00001629307,0.00002426405,2.184543e-7,0.00009560238,0.0002435444,0.007917525,0.00281808,0.0007149891,0.001522012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000396521,0.00009025711,0.9963683,0.000001675844,0.00002316231,0.00003804806,0.00003659526,0.0004759049,0.000327585,0.0003245914,0.001832172,0.00008516424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965869,0.000418517,0.002100947,0.0001194057,0.0004212111,0.0001399706,0.00001017845,0.000009821627,0.0001930806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982252,0.00001360488,0.001219483,0.00006683947,0.0001877423,0.00000733462,0.0001817631,0.000003739924,0.00009429258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009817658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3135206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00562392742756922,"score_gpt":0.2435528138744887,"score_spread":0.2379288864469194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}