{"id":"W2089977801","doi":"10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.085","title":"Six Sigma based approach to optimize radial forging operation variables","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Processing Technology","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Forming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"DMAIC; Taguchi methods; Six Sigma; Forging; Response surface methodology; Process (computing); Design of experiments; Manufacturing engineering; Quality (philosophy); Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Lean manufacturing; Machine learning; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562356,0.001383097,0.001394623,0.001536903,0.0005614477,0.001217007,0.001120823,0.001174806,0.002913256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001813012,0.0007103917,0.001220154,0.001197812,0.0003838582,0.0007475548,0.0006418848,0.001217105,0.0004145006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009130634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001534049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00537591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00474592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991456,0.0002825885,0.00004520464,0.00008118998,0.000369944,0.00007541887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.0003480389,0.00008326449,0.00005590188,0.000486086,0.00003164423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008323007,0.0001281461,0.000534026,0.00004658088,0.00006480772,0.00002606656,0.00003435514,0.9446976,0.001665942,0.002123624,0.0004448894,0.05015075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001065376,0.00006289697,0.000120124,0.00000660879,0.0000141714,0.000005672076,0.00001036133,0.9975528,0.001138038,0.0007715234,0.0003010966,0.000006132947],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03970794,0.0002183561,0.9540127,0.0001343547,0.00006931255,0.00008603182,0.00009214369,0.0004369373,0.005242258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6869782,0.0001667642,0.3075385,0.0001246142,0.0000264211,0.0002295413,0.0002567995,0.000142994,0.004536116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00537591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01068926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01025207460544491,"score_gpt":0.2270397392274052,"score_spread":0.2167876646219603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}