{"id":"W2089984367","doi":"10.1016/j.comgeo.2012.10.010","title":"Closest pair and the post office problem for stochastic points","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Geometry","topic":"Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Euclidean space; Mathematics; Point (geometry); Stochastic geometry; Set (abstract data type); Combinatorics; Euclidean geometry; Space (punctuation); Discrete mathematics; Stochastic process; Computational geometry; Algorithm; Computer science; Geometry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034601,0.0001631839,0.0001745968,0.0002252611,0.000387679,0.0001769815,0.0003556105,0.00005305413,0.00001185283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000324609,0.000124566,0.00008634062,0.000666015,0.000114265,0.0006251916,0.0001903991,0.0001117351,0.00005296216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000327806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009631681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005461514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.965045e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986156,0.0001018603,0.0002924589,0.0002977785,0.0003711679,0.0003210879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970834,0.002060045,0.0001355246,0.000195054,0.0003881071,0.0001379158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001158458,0.0001746245,0.0004034503,0.00005208157,0.00006075237,4.942194e-7,0.0007153263,0.1748459,0.00002427459,0.7882373,0.002599994,0.03277002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003827717,0.0001697008,0.04907366,0.0000303178,0.00004537563,0.0001614213,0.00006983153,0.8231261,0.00005356501,0.1151694,0.007790846,0.0004821335],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03881567,0.0007710821,0.9545932,0.004470889,0.0004834545,0.0005522097,0.00001699546,0.00009278594,0.000203689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427634,0.000001835766,0.154988,0.001543283,0.0003502404,0.00007469462,0.00008427225,0.00001030697,0.0001840296],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5079653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01434081949179447,"score_gpt":0.2480492072605325,"score_spread":0.233708387768738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}