{"id":"W2090056956","doi":"10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00063-9","title":"Revisiting Uncovered Interest Rate Parity: An Empirical Testing Using Bounds Test Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Economics and Finance","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Interest rate parity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometrics; Parity (physics); Empirical evidence; Arbitrage; Empirical research; Efficient-market hypothesis; Financial economics; Interest rate; Actuarial science; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01759625,0.0005614132,0.001261001,0.002944114,0.0008040882,0.002905906,0.002235729,0.001545026,0.006671424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.128986,0.0002846287,0.001310133,0.002196773,0.002755802,0.004917811,0.002247593,0.002833994,0.0005269299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000641902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009349296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00111879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003602442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986279,0.007496222,0.0007974089,0.001959055,0.002468217,0.001000105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7601403,0.2173562,0.01230293,0.004780486,0.003837402,0.001582676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002039047,0.0009543095,0.5896404,0.0008101693,0.001595462,0.006568683,0.003287491,0.02926197,0.004992458,0.1837726,0.003047739,0.1740297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003883862,0.004123704,0.2071371,0.0004601019,0.001071825,0.002716159,0.007109507,0.5946862,0.01064791,0.1635383,0.007914918,0.0002058987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130601,0.000623671,0.07758762,0.0008068917,0.0001098164,0.00007874274,0.0003381599,0.00008460118,0.007310383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970049,0.0000882255,0.002441481,0.00004086626,0.00004568191,0.00002866659,0.0001527068,0.000006330814,0.0001910717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01759625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2223134595512037,"score_gpt":0.28086222678397,"score_spread":0.05854876723276628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}