{"id":"W2090101614","doi":"10.1177/0734282912449449","title":"The Measurement Invariance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) Across Three Chinese University Student Groups From Canada and China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","topic":"Emotional Intelligence and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measurement invariance; Psychology; Emotional intelligence; Equivalence (formal languages); Beijing; China; Scale (ratio); Social psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Mathematics education; Statistics; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Pure mathematics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002191087,0.0003624116,0.0003500249,0.00152325,0.002155132,0.0009027506,0.0005113936,0.0002019318,0.0009663597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007707038,0.0001526447,0.0004797845,0.001838853,0.001496881,0.0004554885,0.001372812,0.0005402183,0.00008672909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004035967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008397573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6234525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984797,0.000192964,0.0001463199,0.0002367779,0.000631322,0.000312956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976054,0.0003642666,0.0003159755,0.0001994789,0.001112102,0.0004027573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001545236,0.00008009548,0.9502636,0.00003233182,0.0001146967,0.0001663301,0.01211092,0.0002188266,0.001714325,0.0008068524,0.000336451,0.0340011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001114376,0.00004103109,0.9946621,0.000008625811,0.00002299874,0.00004647331,0.003811535,0.0003456846,0.0004039541,0.0001483923,0.0004852246,0.00001287709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989532,0.00002477896,0.0001305141,0.00003646177,0.00000405746,0.00002394275,0.00004385773,0.000001952886,0.0007812222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999234,0.00003084022,0.0002605729,0.00002261435,0.000001995381,0.00003160062,0.0001577816,0.00000201092,0.0002586479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8424674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03304133112329282,"score_gpt":0.3556355618888588,"score_spread":0.322594230765566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}