{"id":"W2090118413","doi":"10.1186/1476-072x-9-21","title":"Feasibility and utility of mapping disease risk at the neighbourhood level within a Canadian public health unit: an ecological study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Geographics","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Imperial College London; Cancer Care Ontario","keywords":"Health geography; Demography; Cancer registry; Geography; Public health; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Census; Population; Socioeconomic status; Geocoding; Medicine; Cartography; Environmental health; Health policy; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008603865,0.0001660079,0.0004842523,0.0004793654,0.0003597835,0.00005442696,0.0004796524,0.00006274955,0.0001785924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002187344,0.0001145632,0.0001481106,0.0003314021,0.0003664029,0.0002031886,0.0001290042,0.0009482388,0.000001168112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002064858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004809098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02751783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4093346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962036,0.0009902583,0.001204193,0.0002928456,0.0009312895,0.0003778378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949354,0.0002650502,0.001359119,0.0004941752,0.0012171,0.001729144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002611518,0.001381516,0.9871186,0.00004349745,0.0001771005,0.00005216214,0.0006886679,0.000002309986,0.000001720587,0.0003087291,0.0001307304,0.009833824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001725241,0.0005676952,0.993434,0.00004579304,0.00002563462,0.0001129926,0.0009375826,0.0003732826,2.388728e-7,0.0006198755,0.002079699,0.00007797468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700473,0.0006862373,0.00009087336,0.02640325,0.0006693085,0.0006575483,0.001401936,0.00001337868,0.00003019552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964749,0.0002808158,0.000423273,0.00257691,0.0001373612,0.000005177996,0.00008500583,0.00001197469,0.00000461738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1461122016881996,"score_gpt":0.3833587508590534,"score_spread":0.2372465491708538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}