{"id":"W2090118413","doi":"10.1186/1476-072x-9-21","title":"Feasibility and utility of mapping disease risk at the neighbourhood level within a Canadian public health unit: an ecological study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Geographics","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Imperial College London; Cancer Care Ontario","keywords":"Health geography; Demography; Cancer registry; Geography; Public health; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Census; Population; Socioeconomic status; Geocoding; Medicine; Cartography; Environmental health; Health policy; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159916,0.0004436826,0.0003783776,0.002490867,0.003646375,0.001438209,0.002005521,0.0003960323,0.000945401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01255603,0.0002749754,0.0005956236,0.004164359,0.0008870909,0.0005822695,0.001844148,0.0002986111,0.0001357606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01904987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02741673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997707,0.0006327115,0.0001002845,0.0004494931,0.0006808401,0.0004297405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955162,0.00065467,0.0005150717,0.0003779354,0.002368023,0.0005681131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001101575,0.00006170532,0.9778861,0.00009792307,0.0001100742,0.000104834,0.002173173,0.0008748325,0.0003893293,0.0006065792,0.0007075929,0.01687778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001764999,0.00009253377,0.9917046,0.00004499859,0.0000717877,0.00006700097,0.00292911,0.002574683,0.0001361209,0.0002067522,0.00213523,0.00001951181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889883,0.0004783134,0.002844718,0.0002957547,0.00001490045,0.0003743726,0.002352722,0.00002448375,0.004626419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935382,0.0002195792,0.004826281,0.00007068195,0.000006244972,0.0001852368,0.0007277255,0.000005718643,0.0004203845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01904987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1382171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1461122016881996,"score_gpt":0.3833587508590534,"score_spread":0.2372465491708538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}