{"id":"W2090184351","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2009.9669225","title":"Comparability over Time of the Human Development Index: A Shapley Value Approach","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Shapley value; Human Development Index; Index (typography); Value (mathematics); Human development (humanity); Economics; Environmental economics; Regional science; Operations research; Econometrics; Public economics; Economic growth; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Geography; Computer science; Statistics; Game theory","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005917931,0.0007979331,0.001642191,0.0005228947,0.002622014,0.0001118768,0.001938626,0.0003328168,0.0004889006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006314337,0.0006989606,0.0004462483,0.001420227,0.001316517,0.0004094925,0.0002011128,0.0008028925,0.00002116754],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01461994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01499568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02242496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5009487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926034,0.0007891463,0.003079248,0.0006837305,0.0007964403,0.002048065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937107,0.0001911439,0.001876907,0.0006031346,0.001708013,0.001910101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007928145,0.001142064,0.3531536,0.000947081,0.00342858,0.0001822154,0.491032,0.0007475134,0.0000621494,0.0983399,0.03191789,0.01896773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001830179,0.0003195155,0.7489647,0.001354384,0.000241783,0.00006034916,0.01339052,0.00005925632,0.0002233213,0.002287061,0.2301748,0.001094103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731032,0.003550148,0.00008826396,0.01494867,0.002568511,0.0009510111,0.00003798954,0.00001357904,0.004738641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926338,0.0002139856,0.002699923,0.001808226,0.0005824464,0.00002277781,0.00001501411,0.00004028727,0.001983604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4785237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08204983857924254,"score_gpt":0.2883628813371544,"score_spread":0.2063130427579118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}