{"id":"W2090205073","doi":"10.1108/17410400810857239","title":"The performance appraisal congruency scale: an assessment of person‐environment fit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Performance appraisal; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Extant taxon; Job satisfaction; Applied psychology; Construct (python library); Social psychology; Originality; Management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003040018,0.0003086278,0.0003588382,0.00207502,0.0005024081,0.0008795925,0.0004176489,0.0005214165,0.004301775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106422,0.0001850887,0.0006609912,0.0009298982,0.0004222101,0.0008775656,0.001533969,0.0008649427,0.0005023357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003850818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005401745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005103927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008277956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977657,0.0007950932,0.0002792691,0.0001295346,0.0008867774,0.000143677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936488,0.002165366,0.002023488,0.000407934,0.001082708,0.0006716599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005243511,0.00142028,0.8512973,0.0002806741,0.0002909855,0.0002942797,0.003487268,0.001238066,0.004336695,0.00259423,0.004791528,0.1294445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005015403,0.0005735341,0.9887192,0.00006521673,0.00003389219,0.0002620678,0.001554638,0.001875188,0.0008006467,0.001535756,0.004491259,0.00003853946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751742,0.0002242893,0.007289476,0.0002818425,0.00004990496,0.0007122435,0.0007881945,0.00008285821,0.01539711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894149,0.0001316391,0.008017669,0.00007630585,0.00002495054,0.000631218,0.0005400833,0.00001711922,0.001146003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004301775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01607734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0217060176312412,"score_gpt":0.2791083070396206,"score_spread":0.2574022894083794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}