{"id":"W2090205073","doi":"10.1108/17410400810857239","title":"The performance appraisal congruency scale: an assessment of person‐environment fit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Performance appraisal; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Extant taxon; Job satisfaction; Applied psychology; Construct (python library); Social psychology; Originality; Management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006386454,0.0001332671,0.0001539159,0.000196071,0.0003211552,0.0000972312,0.0003563713,0.00002721421,0.000123956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001864045,0.00009914702,0.00005082801,0.0001329252,0.0001851765,0.00177182,0.0001202602,0.0001674149,0.00001196012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006061428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002970661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000208572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008393306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985312,0.00001655031,0.0003696728,0.0001719129,0.0007679706,0.000142719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990043,0.00002553405,0.0004530954,0.000156272,0.0003405569,0.00002021807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001196226,0.0002684848,0.9464048,0.00007549619,0.0001166151,0.00001071035,0.0001570252,0.001181725,0.0002482845,0.002372442,0.0004421048,0.04860265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005532408,0.00008099322,0.975013,0.00003537672,0.00004680101,0.00007248202,0.0002726364,0.002379344,0.0002351506,0.00002298765,0.0211701,0.0001179306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953734,0.0000771399,0.0002747603,0.001431999,0.00121537,0.0001457679,0.000002057659,0.00001130809,0.001468188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973195,0.0008299744,0.0006626644,0.0001043557,0.0007513827,0.000006333109,0.000005708324,0.00001196282,0.0003081431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04848472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4043098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0217060176312412,"score_gpt":0.2791083070396206,"score_spread":0.2574022894083794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}