{"id":"W2090235487","doi":"10.1142/s0219024913500416","title":"ALLOCATING SYSTEMIC RISK IN A REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Perspective (graphical); Systemic risk; Axiomatic system; Mathematical economics; Aggregate (composite); Economics; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Financial crisis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006726349,0.0007623621,0.0006017605,0.001231202,0.001390404,0.004252307,0.001315266,0.002793647,0.003043259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005091425,0.0005371189,0.001157133,0.00083202,0.006833343,0.005288323,0.002967632,0.003610118,0.000437618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002573141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003714119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001287406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934549,0.003031668,0.0002824874,0.0008089075,0.002055536,0.0003664479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955634,0.001722986,0.0005811176,0.0009404393,0.0009357809,0.0002563103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003767582,0.000007796708,0.00007383519,0.00001025102,0.000006218384,0.00002214848,0.0000559732,0.005894176,0.0003015702,0.991527,0.0001939714,0.001903392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001510799,0.00003179512,0.0001708767,0.00003338054,0.00001826244,0.00005778784,0.00005253284,0.02222738,0.0004749525,0.9685159,0.008382229,0.00001967381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01826449,0.0004175837,0.9205506,0.005544411,0.0001366757,0.00004554848,0.00005766945,0.00009299496,0.05488985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7784042,0.001030243,0.2081481,0.001666048,0.0004965547,0.0002726692,0.00007462089,0.00006219463,0.009845469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006726349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03557277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01086569485777196,"score_gpt":0.297134293206779,"score_spread":0.2862685983490071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}