{"id":"W2090246898","doi":"10.3758/s13428-012-0244-7","title":"Assessing the evidence for response time mixture distributions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; Multinomial distribution; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Mixture model; Categorical distribution; Residual; Sample size determination; Econometrics; Computer science; Probability distribution; Inverse-chi-squared distribution; Algorithm; Distribution fitting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01491329,0.0001719546,0.0002026237,0.0001219884,0.001824881,0.0002227409,0.0006887015,0.0001141865,0.0001296458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01604783,0.0001033426,0.0001542037,0.0008557778,0.001015226,0.0007407218,0.0003414897,0.0007434001,0.0001402919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001017317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006831865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008523818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.170192e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896479,0.008017083,0.0002558698,0.0004804472,0.0005419158,0.001056756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834625,0.01546607,0.00006706593,0.0005982109,0.0002094007,0.0001967556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001665205,0.0002168936,0.003655756,0.000004645576,0.000001637926,0.000007581118,0.0001660734,4.318836e-8,0.9585495,0.0001055001,0.004062639,0.03306321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002062888,0.0002125293,0.1318222,0.00003782145,0.00005099281,0.00007102826,0.0002544859,0.000008811237,0.8316357,0.0003390232,0.03517198,0.0001891441],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864513,0.0005897984,0.003765167,0.007059834,0.0005430803,0.001304308,0.00005890716,0.00009517575,0.0001324174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746035,0.00003904396,0.01834341,0.0002054506,0.0003043175,0.001572784,0.000003133499,0.00003127988,0.004897072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1281664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8694633089275018,"score_gpt":0.7394179691682082,"score_spread":0.1300453397592936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}