{"id":"W2090390871","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.041","title":"Comparison of peak integration methods for the determination of enantiomeric fraction in environmental samples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemosphere","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Deconvolution; Enantiomer; Chemistry; Resolution (logic); Pollutant; Chromatography; Environmental chemistry; Biological system; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Statistics; Mathematics; Stereochemistry; Organic chemistry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005813989,0.0009752891,0.0006972253,0.002849261,0.0005985461,0.00114402,0.001851896,0.001505145,0.001217755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008084846,0.0007992092,0.000837522,0.001242504,0.0004568743,0.0009010973,0.0007354614,0.001334047,0.0009188771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000692549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001050306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00356261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007838726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959471,0.000976724,0.0001659944,0.0004814534,0.002242086,0.0001866485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952396,0.002130098,0.0002321556,0.0002962496,0.001986835,0.000114953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003884867,0.0005045634,0.01265784,0.001227693,0.0006944843,0.000151896,0.00046693,0.002867942,0.7029868,0.001501721,0.001684205,0.271371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001122087,0.001019057,0.02816448,0.0001056147,0.0003956788,0.001112132,0.0001745283,0.03463059,0.9252667,0.0006994213,0.00815788,0.0001617137],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4228411,0.0408877,0.523838,0.0005234951,0.0006625514,0.0005650505,0.00171072,0.002718976,0.006252436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5716616,0.01408393,0.4062473,0.0006223014,0.0001458572,0.0004487312,0.001358638,0.0004328878,0.004998727],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005813989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03074765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02803497091123295,"score_gpt":0.3586992362542364,"score_spread":0.3306642653430034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}