{"id":"W2090400788","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.229-231.2225","title":"Quick Motion Path Plan for Joint-Robot to Pick Tomato under Free-Obstacle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Kinematics; Inverse kinematics; Path (computing); Point (geometry); Motion planning; Motion (physics); Obstacle; Linear motion; Joint (building); Computer science; Robotic arm; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Simulation; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Physics; Structural engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006964703,0.0001891472,0.0002876884,0.00007344021,0.0001374847,0.0001849734,0.0003719039,0.0001071605,0.00001078268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002855007,0.0001756189,0.00002612372,0.00009974723,0.000005281578,0.0001906731,0.0003388157,0.00004030976,0.00005901175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003438621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002021372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002070031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.812351e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986404,0.000026934,0.0002906224,0.0003562024,0.0001833551,0.0005025427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990565,0.00004966011,0.0001131413,0.0005167628,0.00003471265,0.0002291761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355935,0.00004993878,0.000001384079,0.00004687953,0.00001519842,7.53116e-7,0.0005822071,0.00008282404,0.1832757,0.8120141,0.001348099,0.002569359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002861416,0.0004679413,0.001191588,0.0001270645,0.00007401106,0.0001025257,0.0004615375,0.0154653,0.5640472,0.4108645,0.002885018,0.001451909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02047269,0.00002607261,0.976439,0.0002967954,0.00178143,0.0006617533,0.00004838233,0.0001727387,0.0001011647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4443512,0.000004091332,0.5544554,0.000661737,0.0002418348,0.0001728926,0.00002205505,0.00002509251,0.00006563163],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4238786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7161532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03570213773754976,"score_gpt":0.2436301911160423,"score_spread":0.2079280533784926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}