{"id":"W2090400788","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.229-231.2225","title":"Quick Motion Path Plan for Joint-Robot to Pick Tomato under Free-Obstacle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Kinematics; Inverse kinematics; Path (computing); Point (geometry); Motion planning; Motion (physics); Obstacle; Linear motion; Joint (building); Computer science; Robotic arm; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Simulation; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Physics; Structural engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002640409,0.0006833152,0.0003939057,0.0004256202,0.0004380343,0.0002556379,0.0006356176,0.000421758,0.002105709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005139687,0.0003681754,0.0003058465,0.0003162997,0.0003821881,0.0004988479,0.0004928224,0.0003265058,0.0003298177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003239846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00104508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003101086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003055547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998531,0.0000221243,0.000006604488,0.00003955504,0.00006255654,0.00001599404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998783,0.00003224328,0.00001932165,0.0000170792,0.00003919995,0.00001379156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002359689,0.00006097794,0.001305967,0.0002483736,0.00004783781,0.0002292406,0.0003265124,0.6072499,0.05743147,0.01608433,0.002760386,0.314019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004430886,0.0001196246,0.0004242949,0.000009296593,0.00001330125,0.00009273964,0.00004431572,0.9823063,0.01011971,0.003855913,0.002947871,0.00002227382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01436207,0.00006346846,0.9838293,0.00002503899,0.00001465844,0.00004568132,0.00002362629,0.0006165756,0.001019648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.378563,0.0001264004,0.6178997,0.00002464966,0.000008291383,0.0002256515,0.0001319124,0.0000969968,0.002923399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003101086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007044315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03570213773754976,"score_gpt":0.2436301911160423,"score_spread":0.2079280533784926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}