{"id":"W2090413150","doi":"10.1080/01690960802201010","title":"Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Suffix; Word (group theory); Word recognition; Lexical decision task; Danish; Computer science; Point (geometry); Comprehension; Uniqueness; Psychology; Word processing; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Lexical access; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Sentence; Reading (process)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001033796,0.0001481126,0.0001962389,0.00007043281,0.00008403944,0.00002530509,0.00008089618,0.0000956664,0.0006989022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006990622,0.0001259598,0.00002003768,0.0002279001,0.0001098367,0.0001679722,0.0000371588,0.0001885767,0.0002706911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001167445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004420505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002613552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004550824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989569,0.0001240496,0.0001720362,0.0004053746,0.000118263,0.0002234144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.001255638,0.00005931444,0.00008073732,0.00009188188,0.0000677438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007776025,0.0005763434,0.3155029,0.0003482673,0.0001562706,0.0138882,0.1751734,1.167308e-7,0.001551906,0.000008609382,0.003506892,0.4885094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001428897,0.000206092,0.9796618,0.001867046,0.00005229406,0.000424966,0.009920116,0.000001454055,0.004892044,0.000635517,0.0004637697,0.000446055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98224,0.01256556,0.0002803314,0.00004930878,0.0002364387,0.0001897823,0.0000211815,0.00006788626,0.004349498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969844,0.0003657781,0.0004029405,0.0006740338,0.0002848558,0.0001921821,0.00005503252,0.00001184119,0.001028921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6641588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03302386138428928,"score_gpt":0.3060875362745025,"score_spread":0.2730636748902133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}