{"id":"W2090448769","doi":"10.1080/713609921","title":"An Ecological Risk Assessment of Ammonia in the Aquatic Environment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Environment and Climate Change Canada; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Wastewater; Aquatic ecosystem; Effluent; Ecosystem; Aquatic environment; Sewage treatment; Risk assessment; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental protection; Business; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004312529,0.0002390548,0.0002925524,0.00009580451,0.000513425,0.0002934979,0.0007500966,0.0001406042,0.006653217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007870719,0.0001538379,0.0001192674,0.00008869643,0.0003649969,0.0006255867,0.000130693,0.0008718934,0.00003772155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005170437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004107871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001944442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004882801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995012,0.002436329,0.0007785306,0.0004155157,0.0009822038,0.0003754298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986461,0.0002496419,0.0005894947,0.0002701405,0.00001839017,0.0002262112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001605439,0.003591895,0.9780693,0.000001618847,0.00004885804,0.00005365837,0.0004969807,0.003733336,0.0005663358,0.01118736,0.0001404373,0.002094175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001098898,0.001292813,0.9655198,0.000006325062,0.00003916827,0.00005458814,0.0007846204,0.004496924,0.00002053926,0.02212313,0.004359963,0.0002032331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915299,0.000008602175,0.002238451,0.0004961327,0.0002163145,0.000272171,0.00002516843,0.00001371354,0.005199556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885561,0.0004363196,0.01034998,0.0004332643,0.00009240731,0.00003689731,0.00002424488,0.000008691542,0.00006212694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03348069332179002,"score_gpt":0.3521351572087577,"score_spread":0.3186544638869676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}