{"id":"W2090501339","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2006.08.008","title":"Development of a loading dock safety evaluation tool","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; DOCK; Context (archaeology); Transport engineering; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazardous waste; Poison control; Relation (database); Computer science; Automotive engineering; Business; Marine engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1006308,0.0001450747,0.0004905721,0.001094849,0.001581051,0.000009670499,0.0005221007,0.000273244,0.001978425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586408,0.0001165142,0.0001329511,0.001324701,0.0001482739,0.0003144963,0.0002422821,0.002574789,0.0002609341],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002183581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000502103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001688432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881412,0.001993493,0.003204076,0.0002258731,0.005147647,0.001287721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838815,0.006336464,0.0008255236,0.0003225388,0.008115324,0.0005186501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02305941,0.0007393745,0.09703854,0.001369715,0.0002100354,0.00004969852,0.01274322,0.0001376519,0.009519194,0.006958838,0.004295654,0.8438787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004754512,0.0006750695,0.82628,0.001367974,0.00001932217,0.00002374766,0.006515277,0.0005670455,0.001399674,0.001161457,0.1570343,0.0002016308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209995,0.001049666,0.008259047,0.00293735,0.001138179,0.002890956,0.00002448018,0.00001759915,0.06268328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822426,0.0004262036,0.01525392,0.00009540134,0.0009289704,0.00002765209,0.00001912772,0.00003068507,0.0009754109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.843677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3386659841552083,"score_gpt":0.605856041967089,"score_spread":0.2671900578118807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}