{"id":"W2090512127","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2014.03.023","title":"On testing the coefficient of variation in an inverse Gaussian population","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Inverse Gaussian distribution; Statistic; Inverse; Gaussian; Statistics; Test statistic; Coefficient of variation; Invariant (physics); Applied mathematics; Transformation (genetics); Mathematical analysis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0550332,0.001650448,0.00351387,0.00436951,0.001374697,0.002906017,0.00564852,0.005972973,0.001901725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3629436,0.001332826,0.002112148,0.003953809,0.01031417,0.006652696,0.005134062,0.003639497,0.000305055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001195406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002575239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007282049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002784216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9373887,0.04886306,0.001605859,0.006741854,0.004171897,0.00122863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2866288,0.6980156,0.004533594,0.006749436,0.002922989,0.00114956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001776401,0.0005317408,0.07404893,0.000453537,0.002223639,0.0008688456,0.001653294,0.4445343,0.004883565,0.2762288,0.003084867,0.1897121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000197525,0.0004915668,0.01287637,0.00009939505,0.00022527,0.0005872751,0.000247214,0.7300179,0.001649201,0.2527225,0.0007466945,0.0001390418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1954073,0.0005219283,0.800323,0.001074103,0.0000741472,0.0001100567,0.000167723,0.0002447101,0.002077063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7339165,0.0008070459,0.2603828,0.0009106362,0.0004419435,0.0004492144,0.001179437,0.0002773753,0.001635092],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0550332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2910469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02996091269570892,"score_gpt":0.271084139490073,"score_spread":0.2411232267943641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}