{"id":"W2090532686","doi":"10.1080/13658810412331280185","title":"A method for examining the spatial dimension of multi-criteria weight sensitivity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Geographical Information Systems","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Attractiveness; Dimension (graph theory); Stakeholder; Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Geographic information system; Spatial analysis; Sensitivity (control systems); Data mining; Management science; Operations research; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics; Cartography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01483114,0.001402564,0.001106773,0.009542101,0.001440965,0.003597004,0.001413993,0.001660661,0.005001732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05521212,0.0007604684,0.002590148,0.01048906,0.002501364,0.003659177,0.003387678,0.003034737,0.0004089701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001671629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002280909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00242733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002629854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866981,0.007038088,0.001069128,0.001433743,0.003435774,0.0003252865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680416,0.02354292,0.002682904,0.002782647,0.002672001,0.000277967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002614931,0.0001958573,0.01373032,0.001393825,0.0007195312,0.0005463987,0.004172664,0.09328184,0.009179594,0.4190496,0.003596869,0.453872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001505175,0.0004007758,0.01078989,0.0005092324,0.0003403493,0.001344143,0.00211507,0.4157293,0.01012179,0.515261,0.04289827,0.0003396369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004028113,0.0001149266,0.9930946,0.00009962247,0.00003588698,0.0001921684,0.0001514619,0.0001319627,0.002151414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06882323,0.0001253068,0.9293869,0.00005354863,0.00002195097,0.0008195398,0.00014365,0.00005265452,0.0005731894],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01483114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07843548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07271125303533933,"score_gpt":0.2755889497739145,"score_spread":0.2028776967385751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}