{"id":"W2090589599","doi":"10.1115/1.4005867","title":"Limit Load Solutions for Cracked Elbows Subjected to Internal Pressure and In-Plane Bending","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CANDU Owners Group","keywords":"Limit load; Limit (mathematics); Bending moment; Internal pressure; Moment (physics); Envelope (radar); Limit analysis; Structural engineering; Mechanics; Bending; Plane (geometry); Materials science; Mathematics; Physics; Engineering; Finite element method; Composite material; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006414267,0.0001823363,0.0004003523,0.0006610972,0.00004258859,0.00002088685,0.000320252,0.0002727989,0.00002268028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008906074,0.0001801453,0.00005543699,0.000428076,0.00004374289,0.0002668895,0.0001114015,0.0006366026,0.000002145732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000510617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001703813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003229084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004780421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986418,0.00003056329,0.0004684035,0.0001232487,0.0001560455,0.000579947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.0002519349,0.0001121437,0.0001845224,0.0001128276,0.0001504606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000282976,0.0002380056,0.01530523,0.0009386103,0.001260595,0.00004583731,0.001194635,0.08188217,0.8395694,0.004004069,0.007984703,0.04729372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004010223,0.0009417955,0.03601258,0.001205062,0.001174371,0.002070013,0.0006675376,0.03946046,0.2460399,0.005495186,0.6613626,0.001560217],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2990721,0.02989837,0.6651574,0.001211142,0.003041599,0.0005757534,0.00003978663,0.000488812,0.0005150602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055061,0.0001348447,0.09398364,0.0000150992,0.0002490622,0.00002506632,4.61552e-7,0.00004200019,0.00004372984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.653378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01702039887287019,"score_gpt":0.2714826760634772,"score_spread":0.254462277190607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}