{"id":"W2090626710","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.063","title":"Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Preference; Baseline (sea); Residence; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Cover (algebra); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Biology; Civil engineering; Statistics; Redevelopment; Mathematics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007981553,0.0001205844,0.0001606836,0.00006470756,0.0001265536,0.00002028149,0.0001555385,0.00004700622,0.0006531473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001292775,0.000100423,0.00006741386,0.0000559464,0.0001398542,0.0002369626,0.0001576521,0.0001155749,0.00002429219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003193098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003510655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001429657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005679033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987848,0.00003918176,0.0003849856,0.0001964331,0.0003389499,0.0002556739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.000184543,0.0002548413,0.00009118097,0.000003364701,0.000156181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007101532,0.002222546,0.8495098,0.00006926731,0.0002185299,0.00008844362,0.0008767978,0.0003561333,0.01013559,0.001208645,0.005444302,0.1291598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103516,0.00216137,0.9885946,0.00002046386,0.00006314618,0.00001187244,0.001069401,0.0001387071,0.0002279518,0.001771717,0.004697479,0.000139793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601686,0.00005781972,0.03630786,0.0002937486,0.0001260768,0.0005370373,0.000005058207,0.000005389993,0.002498379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682425,0.0001606486,0.03026008,0.000362692,0.00005068581,0.00001166604,0.000001615179,0.000008826377,0.0009012588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1390848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0311443754712301,"score_gpt":0.3155664129408474,"score_spread":0.2844220374696173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}