{"id":"W2090626710","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.063","title":"Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Preference; Baseline (sea); Residence; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Cover (algebra); Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Biology; Civil engineering; Statistics; Redevelopment; Mathematics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009232286,0.000327254,0.0002743537,0.0009889784,0.0003568245,0.0004224424,0.0003136532,0.0003267468,0.003822976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002569956,0.0001074225,0.0003146263,0.0003201972,0.0002444089,0.0004714835,0.0004085964,0.0001930235,0.0002698499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000601058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000484525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01075202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03337849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995179,0.0001339478,0.00003142052,0.00005413118,0.0001850117,0.00007749054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.0003555337,0.0001369034,0.00004391493,0.0003642032,0.000178055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02399617,0.00600369,0.5169539,0.0005433942,0.0002700785,0.0005527864,0.001820121,0.03224549,0.2344038,0.0008729172,0.001393671,0.1809438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001734282,0.009548814,0.918835,0.00005126532,0.0001334925,0.0004638082,0.00210036,0.04081466,0.02632447,0.0005827064,0.0008945259,0.00007756514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984456,0.00001553172,0.0006995822,0.000005595674,0.000002043753,0.00001543382,0.00004529932,0.000007532677,0.0007635714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.00001050225,0.0007243362,0.000006301274,8.857955e-7,0.00000984206,0.0000386943,0.000002583597,0.0006121045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02137887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0311443754712301,"score_gpt":0.3155664129408474,"score_spread":0.2844220374696173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}