{"id":"W2090824016","doi":"10.1139/l07-095","title":"Impacts of cathodic protection on pipe break probabilities: a Toronto case study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cathodic protection; Environmental science; Forensic engineering; Water pipe; Engineering; Inlet; Mechanical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009384687,0.0007663721,0.0003785202,0.001525562,0.001023861,0.0009557888,0.001407558,0.001161758,0.00363083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003550705,0.0004223268,0.0008267593,0.002111124,0.001102755,0.0005446256,0.0006768862,0.0006135579,0.0002361311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00436809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8386028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8866274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990999,0.0001823671,0.0000391778,0.0001305236,0.0002923635,0.0002556556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962091,0.001871354,0.0005416746,0.0002118283,0.0008851754,0.0002807626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001095863,0.0003961608,0.2114697,0.0004268248,0.0003544186,0.0070427,0.001150165,0.7344835,0.006554166,0.005510688,0.007086472,0.02442927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002764081,0.001368772,0.471638,0.0001264766,0.0004882424,0.001625528,0.005573785,0.4960468,0.00833083,0.00189163,0.01238564,0.0002479077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886537,0.0004257577,0.001789926,0.0002684038,0.000009491557,0.00009199722,0.002825574,0.00004354726,0.005891487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955007,0.0003352341,0.0007884082,0.00001242594,0.000004392098,0.00002495185,0.001021124,0.000007383197,0.002305288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1613972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3246953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01232895874080642,"score_gpt":0.1810284816649732,"score_spread":0.1686995229241668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}