{"id":"W2090969660","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2004.tb00092.x","title":"Cost‐effective Targeting of Riparian Buffers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Riparian zone; Watershed; Riparian buffer; Environmental science; Marginal cost; Buffer strip; Watershed management; Marginal utility; Environmental resource management; Agriculture; Computer science; Economics; Habitat; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009925077,0.0004567056,0.0005673184,0.0007181044,0.0003404092,0.001266148,0.001704957,0.0008275139,0.003567706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002850559,0.0004828663,0.0004488719,0.0006970699,0.00049313,0.001983822,0.0009002446,0.0004527781,0.0002588232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002568037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001717244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01176027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01283432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994863,0.0001969413,0.00001522245,0.00007172364,0.000111518,0.0001181702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991463,0.0004662461,0.0001814289,0.0000547607,0.00007080015,0.00008053624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003732964,0.00003403797,0.002042977,0.00002514906,0.00001781321,0.00005859742,0.00002779442,0.972403,0.0006069693,0.01265667,0.0003029157,0.01178669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013722,0.00005842932,0.001889786,0.00001057986,0.00002746245,0.00005606893,0.00007485721,0.9865175,0.0006783736,0.008992645,0.001666456,0.00001411442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3419333,0.0007910687,0.6327341,0.001088844,0.00003745265,0.0003411451,0.000700206,0.0003960514,0.02197786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577947,0.0003951869,0.03797749,0.00004363211,0.000008446475,0.0001000743,0.0001339656,0.0000340771,0.003512471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02338362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01199986984586398,"score_gpt":0.157576975427767,"score_spread":0.145577105581903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}