{"id":"W2090978573","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.010","title":"Analysis of livelihood security: A case study in the Kali-Khola watershed of Nepal","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Agriculture; Agricultural productivity; Business; Watershed; Food security; Watershed management; Diversification (marketing strategy); Geography; Agroforestry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004006806,0.0000968265,0.0002497658,0.00005181768,0.00005143143,0.00001388698,0.0002721771,0.00002497317,0.00009268054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001932983,0.00002719465,0.0001955601,0.0004335605,0.00005845231,0.00008725465,0.00008728756,0.00008900733,0.000001131681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002988484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.970503e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007129229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008186242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987281,0.0001272439,0.0004924518,0.000114124,0.0004129612,0.000125115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995191,0.00005323055,0.0003423757,0.00005190775,0.000007754766,0.00002564503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001093625,0.004950248,0.9431216,0.00001647193,0.0006825142,0.002961346,0.003211348,0.001472607,0.02830843,0.00005162676,0.0001273553,0.0149871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002564968,0.0005550379,0.9464601,0.00000814864,0.0004700129,0.00009136993,0.05159663,0.00003441796,0.0002449681,0.00004714449,0.0001715848,0.00006406463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991568,0.0001611547,9.978014e-7,0.0001259008,0.00001799194,0.0002184671,0.00001092347,0.000001217851,0.0003065173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997683,0.00009573786,0.00002646685,0.00002248527,0.00003146619,0.000002504679,0.000004506317,3.690499e-7,0.00004815049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04838528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1108966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005985054307453479,"score_gpt":0.1964622206375001,"score_spread":0.1904771663300466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}