{"id":"W2091007651","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.019","title":"The Trial Protocol Tool: the PRACTIHC software tool that supported the writing of protocols for pragmatic randomized controlled trials","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"University of Aberdeen; European Commission","keywords":"Protocol (science); Randomized controlled trial; Computer science; Calculator; Resource (disambiguation); Research design; Sample (material); Software; Medical physics; Medicine; Surgery; Alternative medicine; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.305337,0.006810263,0.01013848,0.0144926,0.00279934,0.008233753,0.005333877,0.007444711,0.1786263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5094569,0.01191813,0.009278764,0.009354374,0.004209429,0.006449529,0.007490996,0.02107101,0.03452512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005613256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03028043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001876303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002991045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7140529,0.1967236,0.07263265,0.005651922,0.00846778,0.002471143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3318117,0.5661749,0.03153863,0.02797443,0.0366633,0.005837043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02061559,0.0009078929,0.001093437,0.08938751,0.004424457,0.0004881236,0.003181515,0.005973448,0.0021437,0.03438511,0.5593348,0.2780643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1336692,0.002287013,0.003244916,0.0364209,0.006030357,0.000658431,0.0008649037,0.04399082,0.01264903,0.1195212,0.6387052,0.001958091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","genre_scores_codex":[0.001973455,0.001747609,0.4835795,0.007940646,0.007239468,0.4044513,0.05038395,0.03529269,0.007391388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004206982,0.0004871997,0.3669735,0.001307528,0.0004778559,0.6183221,0.002603865,0.002829064,0.002792005],"genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6946629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8566431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8871167904669771,"score_gpt":0.6961434218136551,"score_spread":0.190973368653322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}