{"id":"W2091091221","doi":"10.1063/1.4819595","title":"Quantifying the calibration uncertainty attributable to thermocouple inhomogeneity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIP conference proceedings","topic":"Advanced Sensor Technologies Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Thermocouple; Thermoelectric effect; Calibration; Seebeck coefficient; Materials science; Temperature measurement; Homogeneity (statistics); Thermal; Mechanics; Temperature gradient; Position (finance); Computational physics; Optics; Thermodynamics; Composite material; Physics; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001512193,0.000181364,0.0001706771,0.00008739315,0.0001854537,0.0002754703,0.00055093,0.0001122597,0.0002405326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002773131,0.0001327474,0.00003215394,0.0005279041,0.00008314044,0.000513598,0.0001552904,0.0003470241,0.0001877786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002382412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001537013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003946863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987625,0.000005412203,0.0001990112,0.0002530537,0.0002629536,0.0005170007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992884,0.00005827633,0.00002955275,0.0002067029,0.0003207761,0.00009622316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008068824,0.00001507028,0.01440066,0.00007607976,0.00002807035,9.355645e-7,0.001007979,0.003887331,0.949464,0.004705311,0.005099865,0.02130667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000179421,0.00008172268,0.008194982,0.00005101414,0.000007116658,0.000007318455,0.002861291,0.8914863,0.08605558,0.004234087,0.006423166,0.0004180185],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600741,0.00006265519,0.03395816,0.001885817,0.00007634179,0.0008519925,0.000005758449,0.0009666983,0.002118435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981171,0.0000562473,0.001131937,0.0001169548,0.00004146064,0.0003399457,0.000003908943,0.00003146489,0.0001609299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8875989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5413283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05649312623863707,"score_gpt":0.2849805819460666,"score_spread":0.2284874557074296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}