{"id":"W2091122818","doi":"10.1136/bmj.f2267","title":"Comparative safety and effectiveness of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective population based cohort study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; Canadian Diabetes Association","keywords":"Sitagliptin; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Retrospective cohort study; Internal medicine; Cohort; Type 2 diabetes; Population; Proportional hazards model; Cohort study; Diabetes mellitus; Confidence interval; Emergency medicine; Endocrinology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002327681,0.00009636465,0.0003592877,0.00008280399,0.00001709433,0.000006155851,0.00001891675,0.00002035767,0.00001924574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002847028,0.0000692558,0.00001326252,0.000174524,0.00002002355,0.00007450445,0.00001732051,0.00004000633,0.00001120773],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009965173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000227642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003750893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992883,0.0001013972,0.0001564428,0.0001742193,0.0001789001,0.000100741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995541,0.00006723703,0.00007652849,0.0001388778,0.0001316796,0.0000315947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005291317,0.0008586104,0.9980235,0.00006080072,0.0001898847,7.729021e-7,0.00009378105,0.00002730543,0.00001569596,0.00001555394,0.0000348748,0.0001500959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005092343,0.002582051,0.9916168,0.0001457853,0.0001293296,1.061113e-8,0.00008116748,0.0001979892,0.0000667114,0.00001479046,0.000002300412,0.00007065316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940085,0.00001058054,0.000005288893,0.00001750288,0.00002819291,0.004857045,0.000003110159,0.00001308469,0.001056685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995874,3.944879e-7,0.0001262687,0.00001610786,0.000006746362,0.0001249763,0.00009621606,0.000007475019,0.00003443305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006406623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2824169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008254085960437661,"score_gpt":0.2620270626723831,"score_spread":0.2537729767119454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}