{"id":"W2091122818","doi":"10.1136/bmj.f2267","title":"Comparative safety and effectiveness of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective population based cohort study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions; Canadian Diabetes Association","keywords":"Sitagliptin; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Retrospective cohort study; Internal medicine; Cohort; Type 2 diabetes; Population; Proportional hazards model; Cohort study; Diabetes mellitus; Confidence interval; Emergency medicine; Endocrinology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003786484,0.0003124025,0.0007521847,0.0006380524,0.0003308014,0.0009161728,0.0004671249,0.0006627511,0.001139417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009210836,0.0003313181,0.001219016,0.0009826205,0.0003070113,0.0006680682,0.0003790391,0.0007279761,0.0002124646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004222139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005583615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001320653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974324,0.0009585404,0.0003099432,0.0006260553,0.0005047977,0.0001682166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919952,0.002194452,0.003749467,0.000867487,0.0005690366,0.000624255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003830687,0.0001904159,0.9927106,0.00002292292,0.0006890934,0.00009631438,0.00003148979,0.00009609346,0.0001968285,0.00001783073,0.00008426815,0.002033577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000612802,0.003406357,0.993845,0.0000142948,0.0005323162,0.0004428349,0.0000866151,0.0005869554,0.0001390498,0.0000469915,0.0002736739,0.00001313747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984396,0.0005480031,0.0001203933,0.00003831118,0.00001338301,0.00002562674,0.0005606399,0.000002388849,0.0002517729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983981,0.0002374366,0.0001176303,0.00006161184,0.00004042596,0.00002729614,0.001035792,0.000002406877,0.00007926878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003786484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02002513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008254085960437661,"score_gpt":0.2620270626723831,"score_spread":0.2537729767119454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}