{"id":"W2091137776","doi":"10.1037/a0023197","title":"System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; System justification; Social psychology; Status quo; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003013516,0.0002638233,0.0002059638,0.000996942,0.001253346,0.00204447,0.0003640032,0.0006972679,0.006124351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01506331,0.00015665,0.0002738725,0.0005176616,0.002387635,0.0007039728,0.001500517,0.001766317,0.0002623766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009763053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007755946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001011349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977603,0.001210171,0.00009681243,0.0001548432,0.0005441492,0.0002336723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732665,0.01003907,0.01213898,0.001262711,0.001451829,0.001841018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004533787,0.001245777,0.9182279,0.0001908382,0.000199223,0.0002826329,0.01373536,0.000205549,0.005616882,0.02866405,0.0005552719,0.03062325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004714252,0.0003504282,0.9820495,0.00005936185,0.00005296956,0.0003818299,0.006162075,0.0005868344,0.0008246416,0.006381855,0.003083318,0.00001998759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823244,0.0001850902,0.0005033935,0.0004265915,0.00001912622,0.00002237681,0.00002654749,0.000004438858,0.01648821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990157,0.00006584181,0.0002678261,0.00004569615,0.000007880357,0.00001075364,0.00002287566,0.000002138191,0.0005612427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006124351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02048796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1458290281189554,"score_gpt":0.3807375286860594,"score_spread":0.234908500567104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}