{"id":"W2091149552","doi":"10.1784/insi.2009.51.4.192","title":"Optimal selection of non-destructive inspection technique for welded components","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Welding; Forensic engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Structural engineering; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001195974,0.0002739076,0.0003037258,0.0002550661,0.0002702115,0.0000437354,0.00008430077,0.0001889539,0.000002452646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008932326,0.0003018065,0.00006142689,0.0003775388,0.00005277555,0.0004193808,0.00001407643,0.0003076129,0.000001022681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001532678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002459548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003658742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.556501e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988905,0.0000227817,0.0003531415,0.0002991294,0.0001650482,0.0002694009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991973,0.0001728474,0.0001615205,0.000117396,0.0002692868,0.00008163377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004936158,0.00003056875,0.002827761,0.00009429092,0.00005023879,0.000002585419,0.0004152722,0.003798774,0.9874794,0.0002297394,0.00001368116,0.005008291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000753053,0.0005688717,0.1224337,0.0003784953,0.00005611801,0.00007130195,0.0002139576,0.0227121,0.84565,0.006776117,0.00001210802,0.0003741989],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842933,0.0000366361,0.1133594,0.000006496372,0.0005975092,0.000548881,0.00001678332,0.0003208735,0.000820132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505942,0.00001429075,0.04880248,0.000004631223,0.0004262331,0.00009808027,0.00001923595,0.00003724813,0.000003565962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1418294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01945092468084526,"score_gpt":0.2537655732071422,"score_spread":0.234314648526297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}