{"id":"W2091159941","doi":"10.1007/s11009-011-9274-3","title":"Tail Behavior of Poisson Shot Noise Processes under Heavy-tailed Shocks and Actuarial Applications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methodology And Computing In Applied Probability","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Shot noise; Mathematics; Bivariate analysis; Poisson distribution; Shock (circulatory); Compound Poisson process; Econometrics; Poisson process; Noise (video); Zero-inflated model; Statistical physics; Statistics; Applied mathematics; Actuarial science; Poisson regression; Economics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003615182,0.000161054,0.0005648328,0.0001096671,0.0001429895,0.00001492425,0.0001184897,0.0002333642,0.00001703855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003302492,0.0001784951,0.00003413367,0.0002445006,0.0002199691,0.00007902676,0.0001320824,0.0002582298,0.000003023758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004261755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003325554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001566886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005392954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998375,0.0001074383,0.0006974259,0.0004626259,0.00002986802,0.0003276447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986258,0.0007532593,0.0002643843,0.0002486714,0.00003536377,0.00007253766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257938,0.0002216414,0.8741411,0.0002185005,0.000009829534,5.814462e-8,0.001256977,0.0002819285,0.0001045994,0.1143137,0.000001188087,0.009324653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007887169,0.00005812517,0.7167957,0.00001582269,0.00002476232,0.000003249479,0.0001666734,0.003248686,0.0006253122,0.2777978,0.000169533,0.0003056418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7963046,0.001113827,0.2012476,0.00006222666,0.00008215541,0.0005834177,0.00001409156,0.00002380678,0.0005682611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313323,0.00003572933,0.06837299,0.00004256636,0.00007973234,0.0001143369,0.000007035896,0.0000106767,0.000004593722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.163484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.727882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1637959816315942,"score_gpt":0.317970982131859,"score_spread":0.1541750005002648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}