{"id":"W2091186046","doi":"10.2118/137748-ms","title":"An Unconventional Rate Decline Approach for Tight and Fracture-Dominated Gas Wells","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference","topic":"Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Tight gas; Fracture (geology); Geology; Oil shale; Drainage; Petroleum engineering; Hydraulic fracturing; Permeability (electromagnetism); Flow (mathematics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Volumetric flow rate; Work (physics); Mechanics; Geotechnical engineering; Soil science; Materials science; Chemistry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002620171,0.001006015,0.0007453429,0.003346985,0.0004556539,0.001562252,0.002325126,0.001118406,0.002827922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005050019,0.0005007249,0.001280722,0.001522564,0.0005689817,0.00201613,0.001477544,0.001371476,0.00120333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001121724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006312967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006583338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004708401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989691,0.0002120262,0.00007052043,0.0003052751,0.0003256723,0.0001173898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980275,0.0007271926,0.0003733478,0.0002544496,0.0005518402,0.00006564238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003899577,0.0003629833,0.04922173,0.0006068565,0.000180659,0.0008396023,0.001025113,0.4383006,0.03651631,0.0895761,0.004017682,0.3789624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438349,0.0000834008,0.005988071,0.00003068498,0.00002799612,0.0002360476,0.000148279,0.9697758,0.005422196,0.007213874,0.01102098,0.00004323406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05774288,0.0003291748,0.9325052,0.0001769017,0.0000354683,0.000189925,0.0004743769,0.001008909,0.007537144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6132721,0.0003855254,0.3687693,0.00019783,0.00007729775,0.0006040164,0.001221182,0.0006190302,0.01485378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006583338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01385701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008922874985460561,"score_gpt":0.2249727054904008,"score_spread":0.2160498305049402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}