{"id":"W2091188064","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2013.08.003","title":"Market engagement and food insecurity after a climatic hazard","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Food Security","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Vulnerability (computing); Hazard; Food insecurity; Context (archaeology); Business; Moral hazard; Environmental hazard; Socioeconomic status; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Agriculture; Geography; Environmental health; Ecology; Computer security; Population; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000194951,0.0002287889,0.0002172995,0.00000473378,0.0002515677,0.0001643365,0.000243616,0.0001287564,0.0009816178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000512671,0.00007750522,0.0001017218,0.0002753662,0.0001130017,0.0002770939,0.000292867,0.0001793094,0.0001095411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004449002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005991494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002723073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984356,0.0001684789,0.0002412955,0.0004095497,0.0002945041,0.0004506215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994466,0.00007392115,0.0000738395,0.00007749974,0.00007862075,0.000249492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002678227,0.001331715,0.8180867,0.0003048289,0.0002633941,0.00002836248,0.002256572,0.000001631488,0.003480444,0.00914277,0.04471762,0.1201181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001575506,0.0009911841,0.9709289,0.00002685181,0.00001783431,0.0000179879,0.0006113804,0.00005446087,0.0000901264,0.02042234,0.006392919,0.0002884615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934568,0.00122032,0.000001123011,0.0009645346,0.0001167274,0.000533172,0.000171748,0.00009219853,0.003443393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990413,0.0001998723,0.00008088031,0.0004008883,0.0001338125,0.00009086459,0.00001510908,5.924576e-7,0.00003667711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1528421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01177359620793955,"score_gpt":0.2069178196967187,"score_spread":0.1951442234887791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}