{"id":"W2091188064","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2013.08.003","title":"Market engagement and food insecurity after a climatic hazard","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Food Security","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Vulnerability (computing); Hazard; Food insecurity; Context (archaeology); Business; Moral hazard; Environmental hazard; Socioeconomic status; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Agriculture; Geography; Environmental health; Ecology; Computer security; Population; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075639,0.0001244236,0.0001645869,0.0004242409,0.0007318674,0.001719201,0.0002396501,0.001561905,0.007900281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003579253,0.00009894485,0.0002448735,0.0004145336,0.0009020856,0.001192505,0.001367636,0.001080021,0.000335605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005653673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000408931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002793578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005809454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997923,0.00004841636,0.000009532202,0.00002094513,0.00002162227,0.0001072236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980477,0.0003162066,0.0009328221,0.00007086138,0.00009667173,0.0005357393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001021357,0.001223977,0.9414687,0.00004865436,0.0001738675,0.002492269,0.003806646,0.00178915,0.002377185,0.01264348,0.002740854,0.03021386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002526032,0.0002784117,0.9687668,0.00003387768,0.00003057248,0.0003759258,0.009321577,0.002121618,0.000252335,0.01395691,0.004812831,0.00002392943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907939,0.0002673426,0.0001169129,0.003974842,0.00003028062,0.000005621055,0.00008069258,0.000004754793,0.004725627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999272,0.0001200559,0.00001889165,0.0001030776,0.00002701542,0.000002438761,0.00002835418,9.445778e-7,0.000427065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007900281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02642906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01177359620793955,"score_gpt":0.2069178196967187,"score_spread":0.1951442234887791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}